The Lodge at Riverton
12416 South 3600 West, Riverton, UT 84065
Reaching The Lodge at Riverton
The Lodge at Riverton is not on Latter Years yet, so nobody there can answer a message or a tour request through us. Ask us to introduce you and a person here will call them for you, then tell you what they say.
Contact them directly
- (801) 432-2900
- 12416 South 3600 West, Riverton, UT 84065
- https://www.lodgeatriverton.com
- License
- Licensed Assisted Living Facility (Type II)
- Capacity
- 53 residents
- Phone
- (801) 432-2900
- County
- Salt Lake County
- Website
- Visit their website →
- Availability
- Not specified
- Setting
- Medium (30-75 residents)
About
An assisted living community in Riverton, founded in 2016, focused on independence, healthy living, and community for seniors.
From the facility's website · seen Sep 6, 2026 · not confirmed by the facility
State inspection record
Serious findings recent or open
3 serious findings in the state’s three-year record, most recently in 2025.
- The state has visited on a conditional or monitoring inspection in the past year.
- The same rule was cited on more than one visit. Utah treats a repeat as more serious than a first instance.
- At least one finding came from a complaint investigation.
- The state assessed $1,650 in penalties. Utah fines a community for a repeat citation, or when noncompliance caused harm or was likely to.
Most licensed Utah communities have 1 or fewer citations in the state’s three-year record.
A citation is the more serious of the two notices Utah issues for a rule out of compliance. The lesser one, a warning, is not published by the state, so nothing on this record is at that level.
Utah assigns each finding a risk level — Low, Moderate, High or Extreme — based on the likelihood and severity of harm that could result if a rule is out of compliance.
How to read this record →February 4, 2026 · Complaint, Investigation Inspection
No citations from this inspection.
November 4, 2025 · Conditional, Monitoring Inspection
No citations from this inspection.
October 21, 2025 · Conditional, Monitoring Inspection
No citations from this inspection.
October 14, 2025 · Conditional, Monitoring Inspection, Follow-Up, Additional Follow-Up Inspection
No citations from this inspection.
September 29, 2025 · Conditional, Monitoring Inspection, Follow-Up, Additional Follow-Up Inspection
High Provider shall protect each client(R380-80-4(1))
The Licensee was out of compliance with R380-80-4(1) by not protecting each client from exploitation. Exploitation is defined in R380-80 as "the use of client's property, labor or resources without the client's consent or in manner that is contrary to the client's best interest, or for the gain of some person other than the client, including spending a client's funds for the benefit of another". During the inspection 1 resident was not protected from exploitation.
How was this corrected? On October 14, 2025 the licensor verified that the Administrator protected each client from abuse, neglect and exploitation, as stated in rule.
Corrected on October 14, 2025, verified by the state. · $200 penalty
September 11, 2025 · Conditional, Monitoring Inspection, Follow-Up, Additional Follow-Up Inspection
No citations from this inspection.
September 2, 2025 · Complaint, Investigation Inspection, Conditional, Monitoring Inspection, Follow-Up, Additional Follow-Up Inspection
Low Administrator duties(R432-270-7(1)(a)-(n))
The Licensee was out of compliance with R432-270-7(1)(l) by not ensuring the administrator fulfilled all their duties. During the inspection, the licensor requested and reviewed incident reports from August 14, 2025 to the present. The incident reports did not include appropriate corrective actions. Non compliance was previously cited on July 7, 2025 and August 13, 2025.
How was this corrected? On September 11, 2025, the licensor verified that the Administrator reviewed incident reports and documented appropriate corrective action, as stated in rule.
Corrected on September 11, 2025, verified by the state.
Low Written schedule for maintenance(R432-270-24(1))
The licensee was out of compliance with R432-270-24(1), by not ensuring maintenance was conducted to ensure that facility spaces were safe, clean, in good repair and in compliance with Rule 432-6. During the inspection, the licensor completed an environmental tour of the facility and observed unsecured oxygen tanks in resident rooms, a missing shower handle, and soiled carpet. Non compliance was previously cited on July 7 and August 13, 2025.
How was this corrected? On September 11, 2025, the licensor verified that all oxygen tanks were secured in a containment device and carpets were cleaned, as stated in rule.
Corrected on September 11, 2025, verified by the state.
Low Service plan instructions(R432-270-13(3)(a)-(d))
The licensee was out of compliance with R432-270-13(3)(a-d) by not ensuring that a resident’s service plan included a written description of the services to be provided, how services are provided, frequency of services and who will provide the services. Non compliance was previously cited on July 7 and August 13, 2025.
How was this corrected? On September 29, 2025, the licensor verified with the administrator that all required services and instructions were properly added to the service plan, as stated in rule.
Corrected on September 29, 2025, verified by the state.
Low Resident assessment must reflect resident status and be signed(R432-270-12(3)(a)-(b))
The licensee was out of compliance with R432-270-12(3)(a) by not ensuring that the resident assessment accurately reflected the resident’s status when assessed. During the inspection the licensor reviewed one assessment that did not accurately reflect the resident’s status at the time of assessment. Non compliance was previously cited on July 7 and August 13, 2025.
How was this corrected? On September 11, 2025, the licensor verified that the resident assessment for 1 resident reflected their status at the time of assessment, as stated in rule.
Corrected on September 11, 2025, verified by the state.
August 13, 2025 · Conditional, Monitoring Inspection, Follow-Up Inspection
Low Administrator duties(R432-270-7(1)(a)-(n))
The Licensee was out of compliance with R432-270-7(1)(l) by not ensuring the administrator fulfilled all their duties. During the inspection, the licensor requested and reviewed incident reports from August 1, 2025 to the present. The incident reports did not include appropriate corrective actions. Non compliance was previously cited on July 7, 2025.
How was this corrected? On September 11, 2025, the licensor verified that the Administrator reviewed incident reports and documented appropriate corrective action, as stated in rule.
Corrected on September 11, 2025, verified by the state.
Low Secure unit admission agreement(R432-270-15(2)(a)-(b))
The Licensee was out of compliance with R432-270-15(2) by not ensuring that each resident admitted to a secure unit had an admission agreement that indicated placement in the secure unit. During the inspection, 3 residents' admission paperwork was reviewed and they did not have a secure unit agreement or wander risk agreement in their files. Non compliance was previously cited on July 7, 2025.
How was this corrected? On September 2, 2025, the licensor verified that the administrator had ensured all residents signed a secure unit agreement, as stated in rule.
Corrected on September 2, 2025, verified by the state.
Low Service plan instructions(R432-270-13(3)(a)-(d))
The Licensee was out of compliance with R432-270-13(3)(d) by not ensuring that service plans included a written description of who would provide the services to the resident. During the inspection, 3 resident's service plans were reviewed and they did not include who would provide the services to the resident. Non compliance was previously cited on July 7, 2025.
How was this corrected? On September 29, 2025 the licensor verified with the administrator that all required services and instructions were properly added to the service plan, as stated in rule.
Corrected on September 29, 2025, verified by the state.
Low Written resident agreement(R432-270-10(8)(a)-(b))
The Licensee was out of compliance with R432-270-10(8)(a-b) by not ensuring that the prospective resident or the prospective resident's responsible person signed a written admission agreement before admission. During the inspection, 2 residents' files were reviewed and they did not have signed admission agreements. Non compliance was previously cited on July 7, 2025.
How was this corrected? On September 2, 2025, the licensor verified that the administrator ensured all resident had a signed admission agreement, as stated in rule.
Corrected on September 2, 2025, verified by the state.
Low Resident's legal rights(R432-270-9(2)(a)-(b))
The Licensee was out of compliance with 9(2)(a-b) by not ensuring that the administrator or designee gave each resident a written description of the resident's legal rights upon admission that included the following: a description of the manner of protecting personal funds and a statement that the resident may file a complaint with the state-long term care ombudsman and any other advocacy group concerning resident abuse, neglect, and misappropriation of resident property in the facility. During the inspection, the admission paperwork for 3 residents was reviewed that did not receive a copy of their written legal rights which included all of the aforementioned information. Non compliance was previously cited on July 7, 2025.
How was this corrected? On September 2, 2025, the licensor verified that the administrator had ensured all residents received written legal rights, as stated in rule.
Corrected on September 2, 2025, verified by the state.
Low Pets have current vaccinations(R432-270-27(6))
The Licensee was out of compliance with R432-270-27(6) by not ensuring pets kept at the facility had current vaccinations. During the inspection, the licensor requested the current vaccination records for 3 dogs and 1 cat kept at the facility. They were not provided. Non compliance was previously cited on July 7, 2025.
How was this corrected? On September 2, 2025, the licensor verified that the administrator ensured all pets had current vaccinations, as stated in rule.
Corrected on September 2, 2025, verified by the state.
Low Instruction & training for emergencies(R432-270-25(8)(a)-(b))
The Licensee was out of compliance with R432-270-25(8)(a)(b)(i) and (ii) by not ensuring staff and residents received instruction and training in emergency procedures. During the inspection, the 2025 fire and disaster drills were requested and not provided. Non compliance was previously cited on July 7, 2025.
How was this corrected? On September 2, 2025, the licensor verified that the administrator ensured that staff and residents received instruction and training in emergency procedures, as stated in rule.
Corrected on September 2, 2025, verified by the state.
Low Written schedule for maintenance(R432-270-24(1))
The Licensee was out of compliance with R43-270-24(1) by not ensuring that facility equipment and grounds were safe and in compliance with Rule R432-6. During the inspection, an environmental tour of the facility was conducted. Oxygen tanks were unsecured in 3 resident rooms. Non compliance was previously cited on July 7, 2025.
How was this corrected? On September 11, 2025, the licensor verified that all oxygen tanks were secured in a containment device and carpets were cleaned, as stated in rule.
Corrected on September 11, 2025, verified by the state.
Low Employee orientation(R432-270-8(8)(a)-(b))
The Licensee was out of compliance with R432-270-8(8)(b)(i)(ii)(iii)(iv)(v) and (vi) by not ensuring that employees completed orientation. During the inspection, a sample of employee files were reviewed and 2 employees were not oriented and trained on their job description; ethics, confidentiality, residents' rights; the fire and disaster plan; policies and procedures; the reporting responsibility for abuse, neglect and exploitation; and a department-approved core competency training. Non compliance was previously cited on July 7, 2025 and July 15,2024.
How was this corrected? On September 11, 2025, the licensor verified that two employees completed orientation to include a department approved core competency training, as stated in rule.
Corrected on September 11, 2025, verified by the state.
Low Notification of residents rights(R432-270-9(3))
The Licensee was out of compliance with R432-270-9(3) by not ensuring that residents received all required paperwork upon admission. During the inspection, 3 resident's admission paperwork was reviewed. The resident or their responsible person were not notified, at the time of admission, in writing and in language and manner that the resident or the residents responsible person could understand, of the residents rights and rules governing resident conduct and responsibilities during the stay at the facility. Non compliance was previously cited on July 7, 2025.
How was this corrected? On September 2, 2025, the licensor verified that the administrator had ensured all residents received a copy of their legal rights, as stated in rule.
Corrected on September 2, 2025, verified by the state.
July 7, 2025 · Unannounced, Annual Inspection
Low Employee Orientation(R432-270-9(7)(a)-(f))
The Licensee was out of compliance with R432-270-9(7)(a)-(f) by not ensuring that employees completed orientation. During the inspection, a sample of employee files were reviewed and 6 employees were not oriented and trained on their job description; ethics, confidentiality, and residents' rights; the fire and disaster plan; policies and procedures; the reporting responsibility for abuse, neglect and exploitation; and a department-approved core competency training. This is a repeat non-compliance as noted on July 15, 2024.
How was this corrected? On September 11, 2025, the licensor verified that two employees completed orientation to include a department approved core competency training, as stated in rule.
Corrected on September 11, 2025, verified by the state.
High Type II Hospice Patients(R432-270-11(10)(a)-(c))
The Licensee was out of compliance with R432-270-11(10)(c)(i) by not developing emergency evacuation plans for hospice patient residents, who needed help with evacuation. During the inspection, 1 resident was identified to be receiving hospice services and could not evacuate without significant assistance. Their file was reviewed and the licensee did not have an emergency evacuation plan for this resident.
How was this corrected? On July 7, 2025, the licensor verified that the administrator ensured that hospice patient residents, who required significant assistance with evacuation, had an emergency evacuation plan, as stated in rule.
Corrected on July 7, 2025, verified by the state.
March 27, 2025 · Complaint, Investigation Inspection
High Notification of medication errors(R432-270-19(14))
The Licensee was out of compliance with R432-270-19(14) by not ensuring the licensed health care professional was notified when medication errors occurred. During the inspection, the licensor identified 1 resident who had not received a diuretic medication for 10 days and was subsequently admitted to the hospital for 3 days for fluid retention and overload. The Licensee did not provide evidence that the licensed health care professional was notified when the medication errors occurred. This noncompliance was previously cited during inspections dated June 4, 2024, June 25, 2024, July 29, 2024, August 20, 2024, September 11, 2024, and November 18, 2024.
How was this corrected? On September 2, 2025, the licensor verified that the administration ensured that the health care professional was notified of medication errors, as stated in rule.
Corrected on September 2, 2025, verified by the state. · $400 penalty
Moderate Critical incidents reporting requirements(R380-600-7(16)(a)-(d))
The Licensee was out of compliance with R380-600-7(16)(a) by not reporting a critical incident to the office within one business day. During the inspection, the licensor identified that 1 resident was admitted to the hospital due to difficulty breathing, and a critical incident report was not submitted to the office.
How was this corrected? On August 13, 2025, the licensor verified that thee administrator ensured that incident reporting requirements were completed, as stated in rule.
Corrected on August 13, 2025, verified by the state.
December 18, 2024 · Follow-Up, Additional Follow-Up Inspection
No citations from this inspection.
November 18, 2024 · Complaint, Additional Follow-Up Inspection, Complaint, Investigation Inspection
Low Wearing Identification Badge(R432-1-4(1)(a)-(b))
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring that all direct care staff were wearing identification badges. During the inspection, two direct care staff was observed without an identification badge. This is a repeat noncompliance from 7/15/2024, 7/29/2024 and 08/20/2024, and 09/11/2024.
How was this corrected? On 12/18/2024, the licensor verified that the administrator, had ensured employees that had provided direct care to a patient wore an identification badge, as stated in rule.
Corrected on December 18, 2024, verified by the state. · $400 penalty
September 11, 2024 · Complaint, Additional Follow-Up Inspection, Complaint, Investigation Inspection
No citations from this inspection.
August 20, 2024 · Follow-Up, Additional Follow-Up Inspection
Low Accurate and complete records(R432-270-21(1))
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring that resident records were accurate. During the inspection, 1 resident medication administration record was not accurate. This noncompliance was previously cited on 6/4/2024, 6/25/2024 and 7/29/2024.
How was this corrected? On 11/18/2024, the licensor verified with the regional nurse, that accurate and complete records were maintained, as stated in rule.
Corrected on November 18, 2024, verified by the state. · $100 penalty
Low Medication error incident reports(R432-270-19(15))
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring that medication error incident reports were completed when medication errors occurred. During the inspection, medications were identified to not be administered as prescribed and medication error incident reports were not completed. This noncompliance was previously cited on 6/4/2024, 6/25/2024 and 7/29/2024.
How was this corrected? On 12/18/2024, the licensor verified that the administrator, had ensured that medication error incident reports were completed if a medication error was identified, as stated in rule.
Corrected on December 18, 2024, verified by the state. · $100 penalty
Low Notification of medication errors(R432-270-19(14))
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring that the licensed healthcare professional was notified when medication errors occurred. During the inspection, medications were identified to not be administered as prescribed and the licensed healthcare professional was not notified. This noncompliance was previously cited on 6/4/2024, 6/25/2024 and 7/29/2024.
How was this corrected? On 12/18/2024, the licensor verified that the administrator, had ensured the licensed health care professional was notified when medications errors occurred, as stated in rule.
Corrected on December 18, 2024, verified by the state. · $100 penalty
Low Resident unable to self administer medications(R432-270-19(7)(a)-(f))
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring that medications were administered according to the prescribed order. During the inspection, 4 residents did not receive their medications as prescribed. This noncompliance was previously cited on 6/4/2024, 6/25/2024 and 7/29/2024.
How was this corrected? On 12/18/2024, the licensor verified that the administrator, had ensured all medications were administered according to the prescribing order, as stated in rule.
Corrected on December 18, 2024, verified by the state. · $100 penalty
Low Wearing Identification Badge(R432-1-4(1)(a)-(b))
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring that direct care staff were wearing identification badges. During the inspection, 4 direct care staff were observed without name badges. This is a repeat noncompliance from 7/15/2024 and 7/29/2024.
How was this corrected? On 12/18/2024, the licensor verified that the administrator, had ensured employees that had provided direct care to a patient wore an identification badge, as stated in rule.
Corrected on December 18, 2024, verified by the state. · $100 penalty
June 25, 2024 · Complaint, Follow-Up Inspection
Moderate Administrator Duties(R432-270-8(1)(a)-(p))
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring that a thorough investigation was completed when there was a reason to believe a resident had been subjected to abuse or exploitation. During the 6/4/2024 inspection, a resident was identified to have had a card of controlled substances go missing and a thorough investigation was not completed. That investigation along with any other investigations completed since the prior inspection was requested and could not be provided. This noncompliance was previously cited on 6/4/2024.
How was this corrected? On 7/29/2024, the licensor verified that the administrator completed a thorough abuse/neglect investigation when required.
Corrected on July 29, 2024, verified by the state. · $150 penalty
June 4, 2024 · Complaint, Investigation Inspection
Moderate Administrator Duties(R432-270-8(1)(a)-(p))
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring that a thorough investigation was completed when there was a reason to believe a resident had been subjected to abuse or exploitation. During the inspection, a resident was identified to have had a card of controlled substances go missing and a thorough investigation was not completed.
How was this corrected? On 7/29/2024, the licensor verified that the administrator completed a thorough abuse/neglect investigation when required.
Corrected on July 29, 2024, verified by the state.
Own this facility? Claim it to confirm or correct the information above.
Claim this facilityFacility licensing information comes from the Utah DHHS register.