Pineview Assisted Living of Eden

March 17, 2026 · Unannounced, Annual Inspection

No citations from this inspection.

January 15, 2026 · Complaint, Investigation Inspection

• Moderate Administrator duties(R432-270-7(1)(a)-(n))

  The provider was out of compliance with R432-270-7(1)(d) for failing to ensure the administrator conducted regular facility inspections to maintain a safe environment. During the inspection, safety hazards were identified in common areas and resident rooms, and the facility administrator lacked documentation confirming that regular safety inspections had been performed.

  The state has not yet verified this correction. · $150 penalty

• Low Written schedule for maintenance(R432-270-24(1))

  The provider was out of compliance with R432-270-24(1) by not ensuring maintenance, including preventative maintenance, was conducted according to a written schedule to ensure the facility was safe, clean, and in good repair. During the inspection, the licensor observed damage to walls and air return covers that were not on a work order schedule.

  The state has not yet verified this correction. · $100 penalty

April 30, 2025 · Follow-Up Inspection

No citations from this inspection.

March 12, 2025 · Complaint, Investigation Inspection

• Moderate Critical incidents reporting requirements(R380-600-7(16)(a)-(d))

  The licensee was out of compliance with Rule R380-600-7(16)(a) by failing to submit a critical incident report to the office within one business day of the incident. During the inspection, the licensor found that staff had not reported a resident-to-resident incident and a staff-to-resident incident to the office.

  How was this corrected? On April 30, 2025, the licensor conducted incident report and critical incident reviews, staff and resident interviews, and verified that there were no unreported critical incidents, as stated by rule.

  Corrected on April 30, 2025, verified by the state.

• Moderate Administrator Duties(R432-270-8(1)(a)-(p))

  The licensee was out of compliance with Rule R432-270-8-(1)(i) by not completing an investigation where there was reason to believe a resident had been subjected to abuse or neglect. During the inspection, the licensor found that the administrator had not investigated a resident-to-resident physical altercation or a staff-to-resident verbal incident.

  How was this corrected? On April 30, 2025, the licensor conducted incident report and critical incident reviews, staff and resident interviews and verified that the administrator investigated critical incidents, as stated by rule.

  Corrected on April 30, 2025, verified by the state.

• Moderate Client rights(R380-80-6(1)(a)-(i))

  The licensee was out of compliance with rule R380-80-6(1)(b) by failing to ensure that each resident had the right to be treated with dignity, respect, and fairness. During the inspection, the licensor interviewed three residents who stated a medication technician yelled at and belittled a resident.

  How was this corrected? On April 30, 2025, the licensor conducted incident report review and interviews with residents and verified that residents felt safe, were treated with dignity and respect and their rights were being maintained by the provider, as stated by rule.

  Corrected on April 30, 2025, verified by the state.

• Low Resident unable to self administer medications(R432-270-19(7)(a)-(f))

  The licensee was out of compliance with rule R432-270-19(7)(c) by failing to ensure the licensed health care professional delegated the task of medication administration to unlicensed assistive personnel. Specifically, the nurse did not delegate one medication technician. This was a repeat rule noncompliance.

  How was this corrected? On April 30, 2025, the licensor reviewed medication technician delegations and verified that staff who administered medications were delegated by a licensed health care professional, as stated by rule.

  Corrected on April 30, 2025, verified by the state.

• Low Accurate and complete records(R432-270-21(1))

  The licensee was out of compliance with rule R432-270-21(1) by failing to maintain complete and accurate records. Specifically, the licensee did not document a medication error in a resident's medication administration record. This was a repeat rule noncompliance.

  How was this corrected? On April 30, 2025, the licensor reviewed medication error logs and resident medication administration records and verified that medication errors were documented and maintained in records, as stated by rule.

  Corrected on April 30, 2025, verified by the state.

• Low Notification of medication errors(R432-270-19(14))

  The licensee was out of compliance with this rule by failing to notify the licensed health care professional when medication errors occurred. During the inspection, the licensor observed that staff did not report one narcotic medication error to the nurse. This was a repeat rule noncompliance.

  How was this corrected? On April 30, 2025, the licensor verified through medication error report review and staff interviews that the nurse was notified of all medication errors, as stated by rule.

  Corrected on April 30, 2025, verified by the state.

• Low Licensee responsibilities(R432-270-6(1)(a)-(g))

  The licensee was out of compliance with rule R432-270-6(1)(b) by not taking responsibility for the overall operation and control of the facility. During the inspection, the licensor observed feces on the floor and all over the toilet in the public restroom, which staff had not cleaned according to the facility’s policy requiring daily maintenance of public spaces. This was a repeat rule noncompliance.

  How was this corrected? On April 30, 2025, the licensor verified through environmental tour observation, review of staff responsibilities and interviews with staff and residents that the provider was maintaining the cleanliness of the facility and had assumed operations of the facility, as stated by rule.

  Corrected on April 30, 2025, verified by the state.

November 13, 2024 · Follow-Up, Additional Follow-Up Inspection, Non On-Site Inspection

No citations from this inspection.

October 22, 2024 · Follow-Up, Additional Follow-Up Inspection

• Low Employee Orientation(R432-270-9(7)(a)-(f))

  The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring that employees completed orientation. During the inspection, 1 employee had not completed all of the required orientation training, as stated in rule. This non-compliance was previously cited on 7/22/2024, 8/26/2024, and 9/30/2024.

  How was this corrected? On 11/13/2024, the licensor verified that all orientation had been completed, as stated in rule.

  Corrected on November 13, 2024, verified by the state. · $200 penalty

September 30, 2024 · Follow-Up, Additional Follow-Up Inspection

• Low Housekeeping Personnel Trained(R432-270-23(6)(a)-(e))

  The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring housekeeping staff were trained. During the inspection, the files of employees who provided housekeeping were reviewed. They were not trained in preparing and using cleaning solutions, cleaning procedures, proper use of equipment, proper handling of clean and soiled linen and procedures for disposal of solid waste. This non-compliance was previously cited on 7/22/2024 and 8/26/2024.

  How was this corrected? On 10/22/2024, the licensor verified that 2 employees were trained on preparing and using cleaning solutions, cleaning procedures, proper use of equipment, proper handling of clean and soiled linen and procedures for disposal of solid waste, as stated in rule.

  Corrected on October 22, 2024, verified by the state. · $100 penalty

• Low Employee Health Inventory(R432-270-9(14)(a)-(g))

  The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring the personnel health program was followed for all employees. During the inspection, 1 employee did not have documentation of a tuberculosis skin test. This non-compliance was previously cited on 7/22/2024 and 8/26/2024.

  How was this corrected? On 10/22/2024, the licensor verified that 1 employee had documentation of a tuberculosis skin-test, as stated in rule.

  Corrected on October 22, 2024, verified by the state. · $100 penalty

• Low Employee Orientation(R432-270-9(7)(a)-(f))

  The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring that employees completed orientation. During the inspection, 1 employee had not completed all of the required orientation training, as stated in rule. This non-compliance was previously cited on 7/22/2024 and 8/26/2024

  How was this corrected? On 11/13/2024, the licensor verified that all orientation had been completed, as stated in rule.

  Corrected on November 13, 2024, verified by the state. · $100 penalty

August 26, 2024 · Follow-Up, Additional Follow-Up Inspection

• Low Signed and dated resident assessment completed prior to admission(R432-270-13(1))

  The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring a signed and dated resident assessment was completed for each resident. During the inspection, the licensor reviewed 2 resident assessments and observed that not all resident cares were assessed and some resident cares that were assessed did not state the level of assistance and were not completed. This noncompliance was previously cited on 5/29/2024 and 7/22/2024.

  How was this corrected? On 10/22/2024, the licensor verified that a signed and dated resident assessment was completed for 2 residents, as stated in rule.

  Corrected on October 22, 2024, verified by the state. · $100 penalty

• Low Wearing Identification Badge(R432-1-4(1)(a)-(b))

  The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring direct care employees wore name badges. During the inspection, 1 direct care employee was not observed to be wearing a name badge. This noncompliance was previously cited on 5/29/2024 and 7/22/2024.

  How was this corrected? On 8/26/2024, the licensor verified that employees, providing direct care to residents, were wearing identification badges, as stated in rule.

  Corrected on August 26, 2024. The state accepted it without a return visit. · $100 penalty