Reaching Cove Point Retirement
Cove Point Retirement is not on Latter Years yet, so nobody there can answer a message or a tour request through us. Ask us to introduce you and a person here will call them for you, then tell you what they say.
Contact them directly
- (801) 377-9670
- 1988 North Cove Point Lane, Provo, UT 84604
- License
- Licensed Assisted Living Facility (Type I)
- Capacity
- 50 residents
- Phone
- (801) 377-9670
- County
- Utah County
- Availability
- Not specified
- Setting
- Medium (30-75 residents)
About
This facility has not yet added a description. Contact them directly for more information about their services and availability.
State inspection record
Serious findings corrected
11 serious findings in 2025, corrected and closed out by the state.
- At least one finding came from a complaint investigation.
- The state assessed $2,000 in penalties. Utah fines a community for a repeat citation, or when noncompliance caused harm or was likely to.
Most licensed Utah communities have 1 or fewer citations in the state’s three-year record.
A citation is the more serious of the two notices Utah issues for a rule out of compliance. The lesser one, a warning, is not published by the state, so nothing on this record is at that level.
Utah assigns each finding a risk level — Low, Moderate, High or Extreme — based on the likelihood and severity of harm that could result if a rule is out of compliance.
How to read this record →December 10, 2025 · Unannounced, Annual Inspection
No citations from this inspection.
September 23, 2025 · Follow-Up Inspection
No citations from this inspection.
August 20, 2025 · Complaint, Investigation Inspection
High Provider shall protect each client(R380-80-4(1))
The Licensee was out of compliance with R380-80-4(1) by not protecting each client from exploitation. Exploitation is defined in R380-80 as "the use of client's property, labor or resources without the client's consent or in manner that is contrary to the client's best interest, or for the gain of some person other than the client, including spending a clients funds for the benefit of another". During the inspection 1 resident was not protected from exploitation.
How was this corrected? On September 23, 2025, the licensor verified that all residents were protected from exploitation, as stated by rule.
Corrected on September 23, 2025, verified by the state. · $200 penalty
High Provider shall protect each client(R380-80-4(1))
The Licensee was out of compliance with R380-80-4(1) by not protecting each client from exploitation. Exploitation is defined in R380-80 as "the use of client's property, labor or resources without the client's consent or in manner that is contrary to the client's best interest, or for the gain of some person other than the client, including spending a clients funds for the benefit of another". During the inspection 1 resident was not protected from exploitation.
How was this corrected? On September 23, 2025, the licensor verified that all residents were protected from exploitation, as stated by rule.
Corrected on September 23, 2025, verified by the state. · $200 penalty
High Provider shall protect each client(R380-80-4(1))
The Licensee was out of compliance with R380-80-4(1) by not protecting each client from exploitation. Exploitation is defined in R380-80 as "the use of client's property, labor or resources without the client's consent or in manner that is contrary to the client's best interest, or for the gain of some person other than the client, including spending a clients funds for the benefit of another". During the inspection 1 resident was not protected from exploitation.
How was this corrected? On September 23, 2025, the licensor verified that all residents were protected from exploitation, as stated by rule.
Corrected on September 23, 2025, verified by the state. · $200 penalty
High Provider shall protect each client(R380-80-4(1))
The Licensee was out of compliance with R380-80-4(1) by not protecting each client from exploitation. Exploitation is defined in R380-80 as "the use of client's property, labor or resources without the client's consent or in manner that is contrary to the client's best interest, or for the gain of some person other than the client, including spending a clients funds for the benefit of another". During the inspection 1 resident was not protected from exploitation.
How was this corrected? On September 23, 2025, the licensor verified that all residents were protected from exploitation, as stated by rule.
Corrected on September 23, 2025, verified by the state. · $200 penalty
High Administrator duties(R432-270-7(1)(a)-(n))
The Licensee was out of compliance with R432-270-7(1)(k) by not reporting suspected exploitation in accordance with Section [62A-3-305]26B-6-205, and documenting appropriate action if the alleged violation was verified. During the inspection, 1 resident was a victim of exploitation and the Administrator did not report exploitation in accordance with Section 26B-6-205.
How was this corrected? On September 23, 2025, the licensor verified that the Administrator reported exploitation in accordance with Section 26B-6-205, as stated by rule.
Corrected on September 23, 2025, verified by the state. · $200 penalty
High Administrator duties(R432-270-7(1)(a)-(n))
The Licensee was out of compliance with R432-270-7(1)(k) by not reporting suspected exploitation in accordance with Section [62A-3-305]26B-6-205, and documenting appropriate action if the alleged violation was verified. During the inspection, 1 resident was a victim of exploitation and the Administrator did not report the suspected exploitation in accordance with Section 26B-6-205.
How was this corrected? On September 23, 2025, the licensor verified that the Administrator reported exploitation in accordance with Section 26B-6-205, as stated by rule.
Corrected on September 23, 2025, verified by the state. · $200 penalty
High Administrator duties(R432-270-7(1)(a)-(n))
The Licensee was out of compliance with R432-270-7(1)(k) by not reporting suspected exploitation in accordance with Section [62A-3-305]26B-6-205, and documenting appropriate action if the alleged violation was verified. During the inspection, 1 resident was a victim of exploitation and the Administrator did not report exploitation in accordance with Section 26B-6-205.
How was this corrected? On September 23, 2025, the licensor verified that the Administrator reported exploitation in accordance with Section 26B-6-205, as stated by rule.
Corrected on September 23, 2025, verified by the state. · $200 penalty
High Administrator duties(R432-270-7(1)(a)-(n))
The Licensee was out of compliance with R432-270-7(1)(k) by not reporting suspected exploitation in accordance with Section [62A-3-305]26B-6-205, and documenting appropriate action if the alleged violation was verified. During the inspection, 1 resident was a victim of exploitation and the Administrator did not report exploitation in accordance with Section 26B-6-205.
How was this corrected? On September 23, 2025, the licensor verified that the Administrator reported exploitation in accordance with Section 26B-6-205, as stated by rule.
Corrected on September 23, 2025, verified by the state. · $200 penalty
December 9, 2024 · Follow-Up Inspection
No citations from this inspection.
November 20, 2024 · Complaint, Investigation Inspection
High Type I accept and retain residents(R432-270-11(4)(a)-(b))
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring the Type 1 facility retained residents who were capable of taking life-saving action in an emergency without the assistance of another person. During the inspection, 1 resident was identified as not being capable of taking life-saving action in an emergency without the assistance of another person.
How was this corrected? On 12/9/2024, Licensor verified the Type I assisted living facility accepted and retained residents who were ambulatory or mobile and were capable of taking life-saving action in an emergency without the assistance of another person, as stated in rule.
Corrected on December 9, 2024, verified by the state.
December 26, 2023 · Follow-Up Inspection
No citations from this inspection.
December 4, 2023 · Unannounced, Annual Inspection
High Hot water temperatures(R432-270-25(5))
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by not ensuring hot water delivered to public and resident care areas is maintained at temperatures between 105-120 degrees Fahrenheit. During the inspection, the water temperature in the accessible public restroom was 131.2 degrees Fahrenheit.
How was this corrected? 12/26/2023, the licensor verified that the hot water temperatures in the building were at appropraite levels as stated in rule.
Corrected on December 26, 2023, verified by the state. · $200 penalty
High Type I Hospice Patients(R432-270-11(9)(a)-(c))
The provider was out of compliance with this rule by retaining hospice patients who were not capable of exiting the facility without assistance and not having a worker or an individual assigned solely to each specific hospice patient and is on-site to assist the resident in emergency evacuation 24 hours a day, seven days a week. In addition, the provider did not keep copies of the physician’s diagnosis and orders for care for hospice residents. During the inspection, the evacuation plan and physician diagnosis and orders for care were requested for 2 hospice residents. The provider was not able to provide physician diagnosis and orders for care. The evacuation plan provided for 1 hospice patient, who required moderate assistance, did not include a solely designated individual to help hospice patients evacuate in the case of emergency.
How was this corrected? 12/26/2023, the licensor verified that both hospice residents had recent orders and care plans. Both residents had an evacuation plan with a solely designated individual to assist with evacuation.
Corrected on December 26, 2023, verified by the state. · $200 penalty
Is this your facility?
Claim this facilityFacility licensing information comes from the Utah DHHS register.